Dual personality…

    Story:  Don’t you just love it when scientists leave you hanging?  How about the one about an electron (e-) in such a state of movement, and at such astronomical speeds it occupies two distinct spaces at once?  And if this is so, since we are comprised of the same particles, why can’t we occupy two spaces in time simultaneously?  Basically dueling with itself for the same location in the universe.  This information of course come from people scrutinizing elements in the universe which combined in particular structures is what we are made of.  First let me say this particular observation doesn’t seem to work when observing larger compositions of varying elements.   I use the word ‘elements’ loosely because I feel anything which can be observed is an element of the universe.  Anything which is presently in a state of affecting that universe has to be reckoned with.  To me it’s like knowing every person in the world, since their inception and molecularly speaking, before their inception has forever altered the universe.  You cannot take back the movement of an arm, or that particular walk in the park when you ‘moved’ the air which surrounds our planet and therefore altered the shape of our ionosphere and therefore the rest of space and the rest of the universe which we are part.  Yep, you did it; you’re the one were looking for!  The way I see this argument is for one object to occupy two distinct places in the universe at the same identical instant means it must be moving very quickly, and must have left the other space, or it is opposite a piece of black paint and glass constructed by man.  Just kidding of course.  As a willing or un-willing participant in the grand scheme of things, every person and element is there for a reason.  Perhaps that reason has yet to manifest itself to us, I don’t know. I cannot for one moment think this universe which we are participants is a random thing.  I believe the universe has purpose and therefore we by proxy do also.  I do not know if one can exist without the other.  I like to think we are in control, not unwitting participants in an unknown, grand scheme.  Although this sounds a bit arrogant to consider humans having such a major role in ’forever’, nevertheless, I have seen nothing to suggest otherwise.  I will always believe we are ‘key’ or have become ‘key’ elements simply by our conscience and willful participation in this adventure.  We have dealt ourselves into the ‘big game’. To say “why can’t we” (be in two places at once) to me is laziness.   Why imply we are not?  Simply by virtue of our collective mass and our present inability to observe the total

Mass of our collective molecular form vibrating in unison is not reason to think we cannot and therefore do not occupy more than one place simultaneously. To me, any attempt to produce visual proof of this ‘mirror’ mobility seems impossible, since all viewing instruments we presently have are comprised of the same size particles we wish to observe. Perhaps the lens hasn’t been designed yet to let us see clearly.  Not all elements share rates or speeds or orbits.  To take a single electron (e-) and know it moves rapidly is simple comprehension.  To take that same electron and symbiotically link it with other slower moving molecules or combinations of elements and expect them to all ‘come-up-to-speed’ of the original electron seems foolhardy.  They are what they are.  I believe this would alter the individual molecular structure and orbits needed to comprise life, simply by proxy and by doing so would negate their individual participation and their individual contribution to the whole.  The whole being all in existence.  Not what we think or perceive as ’all’, but all.   It is my opinion to move (split an atom) is to move (alter) the whole.  The whole being everything that is.  The effects of unnatural manipulation of any part (regardless of our interpretation of size) is to alter everything eventually.  Is our ability to alter parts of the universe, natural?  I don’t know.  If we as humans alter molecular structure by splitting atoms or molecules, is it a natural occurrence because we as a living entity can?  Furthermore, is it un-natural not to?  If we possess the ability, isn’t it natural that we should?  Unfortunately, where we exist is a laboratory.  Once altered, forever altered.  Were we not given what is, to practice on because of what may be?  Yes we are evolving, but ‘we’ is a mixture of what is.  We are compiled of what has always been; simply in alternate structures which did not exist before.  Insomuch, and collectively we are changing every second we exist.  The universe as we know it will never be the same again.  We may be changing the universe faster than we are learning about it.  We may be perpetually behind in our comprehension and understanding of the universe because we are learning what we have been changing.  We are not learning anything new; we are simply trying to understand what we have already changed.  We will never catch up to what we have not altered!  Change on a molecular and/or on a nano level is recently being measured because change on a mass level has got our attention.  Elements which can attract one another are attracting one another; and without us!  Elements without life as we know it are altering life as we know it!  Either by plan or accident it is happening.  We may or may not be in control.  We can never stop the process of universal alteration; however, there is no reason we as human beings dare stand by as unwitting participants.  We are here now.  Although we did not start this process of perpetual life, we are players, regardless of what extent.  We need to find out if there are any other players.  We as humans are changing the universe by proxy of what we are doing in our little corner of it.  Lives being a collective of mutually beneficial relationships between elements to ‘consciously’ alter the universe.  Without this symbiotic relationship, there is no consciousness in the universe.   There can be no consciousness if there is no one conscious of it.  As previously stated, our thought processes rearrange molecules to occur; therefore, it would stand to reason, simply by thinking, we are changing the location of molecules in the universe, and like a bag of marbles, to move one is to move all.  There is no ‘death or dying’ there is only re-placement of matter and movement.  The question being, is our physical location the only place in the universe this phenomenon occurs? 

 If not, there may be alternate and alien thought processes proceeding simultaneously.  Our primary directive is ‘life’; what may theirs be?  The shock wave may take forever for us to recognize and experience, but it will eventually get here.  We cannot be in two places at the same time because we as a whole are alive.  An electron exists, has movement and thus energy, but it cannot think.  It is an entity unto itself.  Yes, it exists but it is nothing without self recognition.  It cannot have self recognition unless it is recognized; it cannot alter its physical location by itself.  The universe needs us.  Humans are consciously effecting change. Not because we must, because it is natural to do so, and we can.  We effect change simply by thought.  In order for a thought to occur in our minds, molecular and atomic/nano movement must occur.  Therefore to think is to affect the universe.  You cannot take the thought back.  The process is irreversible.  Upon what we call death or dying, our physical structure may dissipate; our mental molecular structure does not disappear from the universe.  The molecules and atoms which make up our individual beings do not all of a sudden vanish.  Every one of those minute specs of the universe are still here, they still exist.  They simply are not in the same collective design as they were when we were last using them to process accomplishments.  There is no reason to think those same particles cannot re-join or re-align to accomplish the same process again.  But will any of us recognize them?  Assuming an electron cannot effect change without being part of a collective; as such, there must be something to change!  To stop one electron, may be to stop the universe as we know it. Maybe not today, but. If by assumption, electrons are the driving force of the universe.  Then it would be prudent to surmise ‘one’ electron has changed the universe.  Does each and every electron need the others to exist?  I don’t know.  Is it fair to say something/anything will not exist if there is no reason for it?  If the particle or electron has no immediate purpose does it vanish?  No, because its position in the universe (its actual physical position) may be occupied by something else if it is not there.  It is already part of the universe.  Every spec and non-spec has a seat in this play!  It can never be removed.  Positions altered, yes; structures altered, yes, but never removed.  Therefore, it serves a purpose even though this particular electron participates in nothing we can determine.  It holds a space, it exists, and therefore it is!  Movement, regardless of its molecular structure is the only thing that powers the universe.  To stop movement is to stop all.  I say this because without movement, there is nothing to stop movement.  How can we alter proximity if proximity is inherently altered by proxy?  Regardless how far away the beach is, the waves are crashing on it!  If there is anyone else in this play, this is why they know we are here.  The ripples of our actions have moved the grains of sand on a distant shore forever.  There is no going back.  Is it really so arrogant to think just for a moment, ‘to address me is to address the evolution of man’ we are all supposed to be here, always! You are going no where my friend…. As far as one tiny particle vibrating fast enough to be in two places as the same time; why not?  What bothers me is that we are moving molecules and electrons around all the time, we are splitting atoms; therefore, what would happen if one of the particles we move (like the split atom) happens to get between the one tiny particle and one of the places it occupies? Wouldn't it be great if they shot a nano-particle or electron from say Minnesota or Michigan and used Cowboy mountain in Washington state to catch it?

continued…RJ

Back