Twinkle..twinkle..global
warming
Story: The next time you're laying on the veranda with the love of your life and your looking to the heavens and you are the first to see the satellite moving through the heavens on its journey; consider this, most are not moving through the heavens, they are stationary. Everyone knows there are hundreds of satellites inserted into orbits or stationary positions around earth, by man; furthermore, it is my opinion their reflective surfaces are sending the sun’s rays towards the earth’s ionosphere and ultimately the earth’s surface. With a very small reflective surface of say 50’ x 50’, that’s 2500 square feet of reflective surface per satellite. Multiply that by a modest 900 satellites (the number being tracked on "J" Track - link on home page 'Satellite Data/Real Time') and you have 2,250,000 square feet of reflective surface aiming the sun’s heat and ultraviolet rays towards earth. Not only do these rays now reflect towards the earth’s surface, but that also means they are not passing earth and continuing on, in the direction they historically did. Imagine for a moment, if you were on the other side of these satellites; that is to say, if you were on another planet out is space, and all of a sudden the sparkle from that distant sun which lit up your sky for thousands of years, is now black; or at least has new, very minute, black hole in your view? The 'black hole' being one of 900 satellites now blocking a distant sun's light from distant observation. Before our satellites, more of the sun’s rays passed the earth and proceeded to outer space. This may not sound like much, but consider for a moment that an acre has 43,560 square feet on its surface. At 900 satellites( and there are more), we have a mirror the with a reflective surface equal to a land mass of 51.6 acres aimed at the earth! A considerable amount of heat to say the least! Now, take another moment and consider that we don’t have one large mirror in space; instead, (hit the 51 acre mirror with a hammer and shatter it) then we have thousands of smaller mirrors reflecting a combined surface heat of fifty one acres (51.6) into and onto the ionosphere and subsequently onto the earths surface from strategically located positions encompassing the circumference of earth! They are heating the surface and ionosphere less at each location but they are warming the surrounding layer of air continuously and uniformly for a collective effect of uniform global warming. It would be interesting to locate the number of satellites which are reflecting above the north and south poles? How many are there? What is the combined ‘mirror’ surface located in space at specific coordinates above the poles, and how much combined heat and ultraviolet rays are being aimed at the ice? Can the location of reflective satellites be used by the super powers to control surface temperatures of other countries; thus controlling their crop outputs and similarly their climates? Is it happening now? Can satellites be positioned to adjust or manipulate the oceans surface currents and thereby control the oceans food sources. One degree would do it. After all, the situation begs the question, why must satellites be made of materials that reflect the sun? Why must we see them from the surface with the naked eye? Most would argue the reflective surface is needed for power; they are solar panels to generate electricity. I say, that may be a great argument, unfortunately, panels used to power the satellites/if any absorb the light, the panels do not reflect sun light. Besides, it doesn't answer the question of why isn’t the sun’s reflection aimed back at the sun instead of at an angle, towards the earth’s ionosphere? Why are the satellites reflective material positioned at such angles as to reflect towards earth? Seem to me it would be a simple thing to aim the surfaces of satellites into space... Why aren’t the bodies of satellites painted flat black or a sub-reflective material/color so they are invisible to us except for tracking stations? An argument is they would absorb too much heat, and we all know the enemy of finite electrical circuitry is heat; so let's just cut the heat in half and see what happens. We have technology to produce stealth airplanes which have unique surface materials and structural designs whereas radar and other tracking apparatus is useless, why not outfit satellites with the same multiple angles of surface to accomplish the same with the sun's rays? Why must the ‘bodies’ of satellites be reflective and angled at the earth? Who needs to be able to see them besides tracking stations? Other than solar panels which are used to recharge the electrical batteries which run the crafts, why shiny? Just a thought. All the best to all of us.
Simply said...
900 satellites with a reflective surface of 2500 square feet each.... would produce a mirror the size of 51.6 acres! If we were to take a mirror the size of 51.6 acres and hit it with a hammer and shatter it and distribute those pieces of reflective glass around our earth, those pieces and distribution would mimic the way satellites now orbit us. The mass is the same, the acreage is the same, the heat is the same, the ultraviolet rays are just as intense; but now they are surrounding us and heating our ionosphere uniformly instead of locally. Go to NASA satellite data/J-TRACKING (JTrack click here) and look at the satellites orbiting the earth. Of interest is the way they are orbiting in concentrations. The site will let you 'click' the small, white dots and track the shadows these orbits create on the earths surface. If you were to click and track all 900, it would look like a yarn ball, except there are great clusters of satellites in the same orbit. If this theory is correct (with regards to the satellites contributions to global warming) these concentrated 'shadows' or paths would be under 'warmer, atmosphere belts' than other portions of the earth surface. These 'warmer, atmosphere mirror belts' could certainly be responsible for migrating weather conditions around the globe. Many places are experiencing hotter summers, colder winters; others, hotter climate where no warm weather was present before, the systems we are familiar with, systems which return every year are a thing of the past; at least in severity or duration. Many common systems which return every year have migrated south, north, east, west, you just can't rely on past data to track future conditions. The Dolphin/Whale effect.
Also consider...others we may be impressing...
Also consider the satellites which are in the way! That is to say, from where I sit, it would be hard to know for sure which direction the reflective heat and light (imagine the plankton in the oceans seeking sun) is pointing. When considering this idea, it would also be prudent to consider the satellites are also putting 51.6 acres of atmosphere in the shade! That is to say, if you put an object between the sun, moon, that object also blocks the sun when the objects are between the sun and earth. Perhaps there is now an object (collectively) 51.6 acres in size, blocking the sun's warmth and ultraviolet rays from reaching the earth; whereas for thousands of years in our evolution the sun's rays passed to earth unabated and contributed to atmospheric weather conditions. Now there is 51 acres of contribution missing! Where are those rays being diverted to, one might ask? Other planets? Can the new 'man made' reflections be seen from other parts of our universe? Because the sun's rays are being diverted, all of a sudden, could we see 'new' suns or stars if we were standing on other planets from which azimuths or locations the 'new' reflections could be seen? Simply said, if we put up a satellite between the sun and the earth, will the suns reflections be diverted off of that satellite to be observed as a new sun or star from elsewhere in the galaxy? And will those 'new' reflections be seen out in space as new stars or planets? Or could they possible be seen as new life by others, or worse yet, hostile? Surely if 'others' detected 'new' suns, planets, or stars where there was darkness before it would at the least peak curiosity, wouldn't it?
Better yet, imagine using the satellites ability to maneuver in space. Now imagine moving the reflective surfaces of hundreds of satellites in unison to focus the sun's heat and ultraviolet rays on a given geographical location. Not dispersed over a wide area by using one large, reflective surface, but aiming and concentrating with pin-point accuracy the combined heat of hundreds of smaller mirrors! I wonder how hot it would get at that location. Let's say a crystal clear day, no wind, not a cloud in the sky, how much heat would a reflective surface the size of 51 acres produce on the tip of a pin? Better said, let's break the 51 acre mirror so we can adjust the concentrations of hundreds of smaller mirrors and aim them to a precise geographical location, (like the facets of a diamond) can you imagine the concentration of heat at the focal point by using the magnification and distortion of moisture in the earth's atmosphere. Would the shape of the ionosphere/atmosphere distort magnification of light/heat the same way a magnifying glass does when using it outside to control the sun's heat? We use to start fires in leaves with one by adjusting the distance from the leaves and the collective abilities of the glass. We bent light and concentrated the heat from it to ignite organic matter. Would the curve of our atmosphere and droplets of H2O/water and reflective particles/carbon, etc., in a plasma suspension do the same to the sun's rays reflected by satellites? Do we need to find out.....?
Imagine aiming ions and controlling the thickness of our ionosphere by using light/heat to 'drag' atoms from one specific location to another by the controlled passage of light/heat and thereby altering static atoms by changing their number of resident electrons and producing in-mass concentrations of atoms that have a net electrical charge because of resident electrons being 'dragged' off? A controlled thickening and thinning of the earth's plasma encapsulation at precise atmospheric locations. "An Atom or group of atoms that has acquired a net electric charge by gaining or losing one or more electrons." (The American Heritage College Dictionary, third edition, pg 716). ("Electron "A stable subatomic particle in the lepton family having a rest mass of 9.1066 X 10¯28 gram and a unit negative electric charge of approx. 1.602 X 10¯19 coulomb. See table at subatomic particle. + - on¹." pg. 442 same) (I saw five or six resting on a beach last year). Man, is this small or what? I'll bet their like snowflakes....by themselves their not much, but a whole bunch can stop millions of tons of cargo on I-5 !!!
Isn't a Photon a particle within the 'classon' family? pg. 1351, same. Photon "The quantum (a specific portion) of electromagnetic energy, generally regarded as a discrete particle having zero mass, no electric charge, and an indefinitely long lifetime. 2. A unit of retinal illumination, equal to the amount of light that reaches the retina through 1 square millimeter of pupil area from a surface having a brightness of 1 candela per square meter. same, pg. 1029." We have retinas, right....we see light right....how much light do you think will reach our retinas from a mirror reflecting the sun's light? How many 'discrete' particles, having zero mass, and no electric charge that lives forever with reach our sight?
Are Photons light? ..discrete particles....with electromagnetic energy....but no electrical charge (so they have energy/motion, they just can't shock you)....and they live forever.
"light electromagnetic radiation that has a wavelength in the range from about 4,000 (violet) to about 7700 (red) angstroms and may be perceived by the normal unaided human eye".
Sooo....if photons are particles and light can be seen, isn't the suns' light radiation, that have electromagnetic radiation, and don't both light and photons have electromagnetic energy? And if so, isn't that 51 acre mirror bombarding us with electromagnetic radiation which was non-existent previously (before we put up satellites). And if radiation is motion, and motion is heat (zero degrees) isn't there quite a bit of heat and radiation (particles) coming our way?
whew!.....to be continued....RJ