I’ll be seeing you again…

    Story.  Do we already ‘live’ forever?  Yes we do, for the universe would ‘not be’ without our interaction and participation.  Motion is the ‘engine’ of the universe and of that we are part and captains of direction.

1. The past is nothing more than a molecular configuration which existed previously.  That is to say the past is molecules, atoms, electrons in a particular order or arrangement.  An arrangement they are no longer in.
2. We are constructed of molecules, atoms, electrons assembled in a particular order or arrangement.  When we age, it is simply these moving particles ceasing to remain in the original arrangement or order.
3. Time is simply the movement of molecules, atoms, and electrons.  They did not go anywhere they simply are not in a static arrangement.  An original arrangement.
4. To go back in time is to rearrange everything in its original arrangement or order and that which movement has altered.
5. To go back to a particular moment in time or moment in movement we must consider rearranging what is.
6. ‘What is’ is ‘what was’ in an alternate arrangement or configuration?
7. We’re existing and moving about in what was; however, disassembled or altered.
8. When thinking of molecules it is safe to say we as humans are nothing more than configurations of these minute particles.
9. There is no way we can move about in ‘what is’ ( a molecular soup) without ‘bumping’ into ‘what was’.  That is to say, our molecular mass bumping into and altering the molecular mass that was only in a different configuration; perhaps a disassembled configuration.  I.E.  to walk down the street and bump into somebody, is to bump into parts of somebody all day on a molecular basis.
10. ‘What is’ is simply the configuration of molecules and atoms presently
11. If we were to put everything back the way it was we would create ‘back then’ or ‘before’ or ‘the past’.
12. To go ‘back’ in time is simply to take the exact configuration makeup of our unique/previous molecular structure/physical configuration and take it to where it existed before and in the precise moment we want to re-exist.  Were we consciously existed moment before.
13. Teleportation can only occur in one of two ways:
    a.  By the ‘mapping’ or ‘mirroring’ of physical molecular structure and assembly.
    b. Or by the ‘mapping’ or ‘mirroring’ of molecular, atomic, electronic configuration and producing an identical match. 
    B.1. the ‘mapping’, disassembly of molecular structure and configuration and the re-assembly at the end/site/destination.
14. You pick up a bag of marbles or a bag of molecules (they are both the same things), and you set the bag over there; you want to go back in time? Put it back where you found it.  The ‘rub’ comes in when you try and put it back because the marbles (which have now moved inside the bag, a simplistic example of the same way molecules move in side us) do not reflect a mirror image/location map of the marbles/molecular configuration of the molecules/marbles when you first picked it up.  To do so would suggest even aging would stop/reverse since your molecular configuration would now reflect/mirror the physical state of previous decay within your body.  Simply said, if you were to ‘map’ your molecular structure and configuration now, and bring your body to a ‘mirror’ image of that molecular map ten years from now, why wouldn’t you be the same age you are now?  As I see it, you would simply have to remove the decay or molecular alterations which have occurred during that ten year period to ‘go back’ to a previous state of existence.  Ask yourself, what would happen if you could enter a machine much like an x-ray machine and ‘map’ your molecular configuration.  Then ten years from now enter the same machine, put in your code, and let the machine eliminate everything not mirrored on the original x-ray?  You would be physically and molecularly altered to mirror or resemble a previous life stage.  You would be physically younger, but conscienceless older/smarter.
15. Again, there is that ‘rub’.  I am not sure we would have to ‘see’ the molecular configuration, but we would have to be able to replicate it.  I look at replicating something you cannot see to the way scientists look at space.  They cannot see most things they are looking for.  The sight of it has not reached earth yet because we can only physically ‘see’ that which reflects light in our spectrum of the ultraviolet spectrum.  Light travels at ………….miles per hour, so the light/reflection of the star or planet or object may not have reached us yet so we can see it.  It is probably one thing that confounds scientist in the space travel arena.  When looking at the stars and planning a ‘route’ for a space ship to take, it may prove a bit tricky when talking about millions of miles because black space between objects doesn’t necessarily mean there is nothing there; perhaps the light or sight of it has not reached us yet so we can see it to navigate around it.  Especially when you consider a space craft may be moving at thousands of miles per hour.  Anyway, using the Hubble telescope I always thought it must have massive telescope lenses on it to see that far; well, wasn’t I the idiot when I found out it had not glass or lenses on it!  Instead, what happens is that scientist know the ultraviolet colors/spectrum of known objects/matter.  Let’s say we look at a piece of gold through a prism while shining light on it and we watch the color/frequency of what degree in the ultraviolet spectrum passes through that same prism.  We let that light hit a white piece of paper.  Now lets say its blue with a little yellow.  Now that we know that; all we have to do is raise a prism to the stars and record what color light passes through it.  If we see blue with a little yellow, way out in space (the way the Hubble does) then we know there’s a bit chunk of gold floating out there!  I probably blew the description, but I think you get the picture.  I would think the same principle could be used to ‘map’ molecular structure/configuration and the same principle used to mirror what is seen by eliminating change.  We don’t have to ‘see’ the molecular configuration or structure; we only have to have a ‘Hubble’ to record the variations in ultraviolet light emissions of atoms, molecules, electrons, record their physical positions, and in ten years, replicate those emissions, physical positions, and mirror what the ‘Hubble’ recorded.  We should have another you, right down to your freckles.  Or we put you in the machine and you feel a tingly sensation as all the ‘molecules of change’ are returned to their previous state of existence, and the ones that where not there are removed. 
16. It may be easier than you think, because just like the light emissions of gold, I’m sure we know what the emissions of generic codes are also.  If we are rebuilding you body, not your consciousness, do we have to use ‘your’ brown hair follicle?  Or are there molecular configurations that are basic/generic to everyone or ‘every body’?  Kind of like Jurassic Park ; we use generic, common, traits to mirror a previous molecular configuration and mirror image, and then we use the rest from you.  Think of it like you will be 75% already constructed/configured before you show up at the doctors.  They just need your molecular thoughts to complete the process.  They need to ‘insert’ a mirror of the molecular configuration ‘map’ of your mind into the molecular configuration of your body!  Since the process of thought/consciousness is molecular/atomic/electronic movement within our minds we should be able to replicate it, right?  Or are we already doing that on a much larger scale with computers, chips, circuit boards, and yes, even electrons.
17. Remember, there is no such tangible thing as ‘time’.  Time is what human beings invented to measure movement.  Everything is movement. 
18. Nothing in our universe occurs without movement; it cannot.
19. Remember, ‘time’ is simply a location, a place.  Time is a state of consciousness.  The molecular motion/configurations which are constantly changing in our universe because of our thought processes do not cease because our bodies’ molecular configurations change.  Those molecular ‘assemblies and/or configurations which allow thought processes do not dissipate.  They do not cease because of our bodies senescence or age or decay.  Only our ‘visible’ configuration dissipates or becomes altered.  And this configuration is a ‘collective’ of symbiotic molecular configurations and structures adherent to you.  On a much simplistic note; if I were to duplicate the molecular movement which occurs when you think ‘blue’, I would have a genetic thought process of the color blue.  On a much more complicated note; that means if I were to duplicate the molecular movement, location, and configuration of your whole ‘molecular mind’ at any given moment, and duplicate that, I should have your molecular/atomic/electronic thought process for any given place in our universe.  I would have your thoughts in my hand, because I would be holding a ‘cluster’ of molecules which are thinking.  Thinking your thoughts because you configured them in that unique configuration.
20. If a persons’ body is consumed or dissipates/ages because of the molecular configuration of a cancer cell or cells ability to disrupt an existing, healthy molecular configuration; we should be able to duplicate all that ‘was’ before the disruption and only all that ‘was’ and return the person to health, or a previous molecular state of existence.  The influence on the body by the cancer cells’ molecular configuration would be ‘mute’ if we had previously ‘mapped’ that persons’ body’s’ molecular ‘mirror’ and configuration before the disruption occurred.
21. Time travel.  We are traveling but it has nothing to do with ‘time’.  We are in a constant state of motion, because molecular structure and orbits demand it.
22.   Without motion all that we have imagined and can imagine ceases.
23. We are not going ‘back’ in time or going to the ‘future’ we are simply moving to a different location within the universe.  ‘Back’ is not some place over there which we left, it is not behind us; ‘back’ is the reverse of what is, a different location which we moved through.  There is no ‘behind’ us.   The ‘future’ is not ahead of us.  We are molecularly occupying the ‘future’ now.  We are physically the ‘future’.  It is not some place we move to.  Our molecular motion and ergo consciousness creates the ‘future’.  The process of molecular thought is ‘future’ incarnate.  Our thoughts collectively are molecular ‘birth’ incarnate of a molecular species existing in ‘molecular/atomic movement’.  All we know will cease without molecular/atomic movement.  By the way, the color ‘blue’ is two carbons, four iodine, six oxygen, one iridium molecule all bonding in a warm environment of 92 degrees; just kidding….but we just may know one day. 
24. Remember, to travel ‘back’ in time is to reconfigure your present molecular configuration and location to a juncture which existed and was therefore representative of your conscience thought previously.
25. Remember, ‘people’ do not die in the sense many of us think ‘death’ represents.  Instead, the ‘cluster’ of molecules which comprise a particular individuals consciousness move on without the ‘grouping’ or ‘clusters’ of molecular assemblies and structures presently referred to as our ‘body’.  Our physical consciousness (molecular/atomic/electronic movement occurring within the confined space of what we now refer to as our ‘skulls’) does not dissipate after that physical separation or death.  The separation of the molecular movement in our brains does not mean we disappear or vanish consciously.  The physical configuration of our unique molecular thought process is simply not encased in that particular ‘body’ of molecular structure referred to as our ‘body’.  It is now moving or not.  Your unique ‘cluster’ of conscience thought is still part of the universal continuum, and therefore, you still exist.  Your very real, physical molecular thoughts are tangible.  They have mass, they have structure, they have movement; therefore, they have life.  Movement is life and without movement our thought processes cease.  You could put your thought processes in your hand, if not for its size.  “Alive” is the state of very tangible, physical existence of molecular interaction within a specific, unique ‘cluster’ of molecules, atoms, and electrons.  These items ‘go’ nowhere!  They do not physically, tangibly, ‘die’ or cease to exist because the ‘whole cluster’ (or body) fails us because of change and re-location of mass and matter.  When you ‘pass on’ ‘you’ really are ‘passing on’.  Your very real physical, tangible molecular structure of thought is  moving without your ‘body’ through existence/universe in the very basic configuration, and we cannot now physically ‘see’ you because of your molecular/atomic size, ever-changing physical location within the universe.  There is no reason for you to re-appear unless you want to be seen and physically participate in change and/or universal alteration.  We can alter things in the universe, we change nothing.  We simply alter the molecular configuration of existence, we change nothing.  Physically your unique thought molecules can be part of the ‘wind’ structure and simply travel physically on the winds’ molecular structures.


26. To ‘go back’ in time is simply to take the exact physical molecular configuration of that ‘time’ which made an individuals ‘cluster’ unique and take it to where it was earlier.  That is to say, take it to the precise molecular configuration we were sharing/in and at the precise moment we want to be.  I do not know if we create or replicate/mirror that moment/previous physical molecular configuration what may happen. 
    a.  did we physically ‘go back’, no we simply moved and reconfigured molecularly.
    
27. Know that if you journey into your mind, and you look closely, smaller, smaller, and smaller; past the enzymes, whole cells, and associated biological mass and you keep going, deeper and deeper; you will eventually stop and pause with awe.  You may take a moment to look up.  When you see life on a molecular level or plane and envision life as molecular structures from within, you realize what is before you is a mirror image of our solar system.  There is so much void or space between molecular particles (which we call planets and stars), we fail to realize our whole being is comprised of the very same structures.  A mirror image of that which we refer to as our universe.  Simply said, if you were small enough to stand inside the molecular structure and/or configuration of H2O (water), it would look like planets revolving around one another, it would not be 'wet'.  To be that small and stand 'in' and amongst conscious thought (remember, the thought process is simply constructed molecular movement within your mind) that thought process would resemble our solar system to the naked eye.  If you were smaller than molecular structures and you looked around yourself, you would see the same view we now see when we look towards space and the planets on a warm summer night.  You will see what you see when you look towards the stars.  You will see the same movement, you will see life.  As molecular movement and atomic movement are us, so are they inside us, so are they forever.  Our molecular structures do not disperse.  So when you are standing on the earth (one of those molecular particles on a larger scale) and you are looking up, out into space, remember, this is the same, identical vision you would have when standing on a smaller particle within molecular thought.  Both visions/views would be identical.  The view we have from earth, is the same view we would have living on an atom.  
28. Can you consider for one moment, our solar system, our universe, our planets may simply be part of molecular and/or atomic structures on another plane of size.  Our universe may be a molecular/atomic structure in a much larger consciousness.  The way we are within our limited world.  We may be thought; we may be molecular consciousness.

Simply said, 

if you were to somehow become as small as you wanted, and were to stand on one of the oxygen atoms in a H2O water molecule and look up; you would see the same view as you see on a clear night from your back yard.  Remember, there is no "wet" in H2O when you are that small.  Remember, there is no reason on that 'plane' of size for the molecular structures which produce your thoughts to stop motion when the 'body' decays.  These molecular structures and symbiotic, molecular relationships have no reason to cease that relationship just because the rest of a human being decays/dies.  Molecules do not stop motion.  When a 'body' dies/decays to the point of disruption of a persons' unique symbiotic relationships, the structures and relationships may disperse and perhaps become diluted within the universe; but it is my contention they do not stop motion.  That is to say, they do not stop their particular functions because they have been separated from a persons' still active, molecular, atomic, electronic  thought process.  On a molecular level or size, why would the (atom) atomic thought process cease?  Why would it have to?  On that level of size, there is no water, no moisture, no oxygen needed nor has there ever been.  These molecular configurations are present in each individual because the 'body' needs them; not the thought process!

There is no reason I should not be able to take a 'x-ray' of sorts, of a human being, and as such make a film or copy of their unique molecular symbiotic structures and concentrations and 'map' those same molecular positions and relationships.  Then in ten years when that same person has aged, or became ill, or simply became tired; I should be able to put that person in front of that same machine, put the previous 'film' of the previous molecular 'map' of their previous molecular structures in the machine and view the changes which have occurred to those structures or additions to those structures in those ten years.  Then I would remove everything/molecules/atoms/electrons, etc., which do not conform or 'fit' the original 'map' and that person should by all accounts be ten years younger, healthier, and full of the same vigor!

to be continued…RJ

Back